Essay Help Services

42003 Task 1 Final Project Report | Engineering

Home Recent Questions 42003 Task 1 Final Project Report | Engineering

Task
Report Components

• An introductory section about the background of the engineering problem addressed
• A literature review section addressing the state-of-the-art of research relating to the research question and establishing the relevance and significance of the project
• A methodology section defining the research design and the methods of data collection and processing
• An analysis section presenting the result of data processing leading to the major findings of research
• A discussion section justifying validity of research findings (this is only one function of a discussion section, not the only function )
• A concluding section which outlines how the project results have addressed the research question and provides recommendations for future research and/or professional practice.

Knowledge (35%)
• Appropriate research methodology
• Robustness of research design
• Systems thinking
• Validity and value of research findings within domain

Content (35%)
• Literature review
• Data collection
• Data analysis
• Synthesis of data into relevant results/findings

Written communication features (30%)
• Clear definition and focus of the research question
• Clear analysis and synthesis
• Critical perspective on research
• Clear justification of research methodologies
• Convincing arguments for the significance of the research
• Appropriate academic language
• Well structured (presentation and organisation) and correct referencing as per Harvard-UTS style
• Length of the final report should have a body of at least 7000 words

High Distinction   
An outstanding 42003 Final Project Report provides the reader a comprehensive and insightful understanding of each of the components.

The report resembles a highly professional publishable work. The report presents clearly focused research work justified by scholarly acknowledged research methodology. The report demonstrates highly proficient engineering problem-solving competencies and systems thinking. The report presents original knowledge that has the potential to be applied to real engineering contexts. Language use is highly appropriate and professional. The report communicates its intentions with clarity.. The report is extremely well presented and organised. Accurately referenced throughout.

Distinction
A superior report that provides the reader with a solid understanding of each of the components.
The report resembles a professional project report for an engineering R&D or a scholarly research project. The report presents substantial research work justified by scholarly acknowledged research methodology. The report demonstrates proficient engineering problem-solving competencies and systems thinking. The report presents situated specific knowledge.
Language use is mostly appropriate, clear and professional. The report is well presented and organised. Accurately referenced throughout with minor or occasional lapses.

Credit
The report provides the reader with a good understanding of each of the components.
A major part of research work presented can be justified by scholarly acknowledged research methodology. The report demonstrates engineering problem-solving competencies and systems thinking at the professional level. The report reflects some original thinking.
Language use is comprehensible and mostly professional with some lapses in formality or accuracy. The report is mostly well presented and organised with some areas for improvement. Limited inaccurate referencing in places.

Pass
The report provides the reader some understanding of each of the components.
The report presents some research in the work (e.g literature study) justified by research methodology. However, the methodology might not be completely appropriate. The report demonstrates some engineering problem-solving competencies and systems thinking at the professional level. The report presents research findings supported by the data.
Language use is comprehensible and mostly professional with some lapses in formality or accuracy. Writing style in places may lead to vagueness of understanding for the reader. The report is presented and organised with some areas needing improvement. There has been some attempt at Referencing.



Similar Posts

Order Now

Latest Reviews

Facebook

Payments And Security